DNA is different than a simple fingerprint. DNA testing discloses private health information about an individual and can be used to make predictions about that person’s physical and mental health. Employers and insurance companies might in the future use this information in a discriminatory fashion.

For this reason, the ACLU of Illinois long has opposed the forced collection of DNA from persons arrested in Illinois. Currently, DNA is collected from persons who are convicted of a crime – and that is where the line should be drawn.

Arrests reflect only one police officer’s finding of probable cause – it is not proof of guilt. Current law recognizes this distinction since Illinois employers cannot discriminate based on arrest records. Allowing DNA collection on arrest will build massive personal databases about individuals in Illinois, databases that will be disproportionately populated by ethnic minorities who, history shows, are far more likely to be arrested, often wrongfully.

Read more about HB 3238.

Date

Monday, March 28, 2011 - 3:15pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Government Accountability and Personal Privacy

Documents

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

On March 17th, the ACLU of Illinois submitted testimony to the House Judiciary Criminal Law Committee regarding House Bills 1519 and 1738 (Amendment 2) which would reinstate the death penalty in Illinois. Unfortunately, both bills passed out of committee and are on second reading in the House.

HB 1738 (Amendment 2) passed out of committee with a vote of 4 in favor, 1 against and 1 member voting present.


Yes

No

Present

HB 1519 passed out of committee with a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against.

Yes

No

Learn more about why the broken death penalty system should not be reinstated.

Date

Sunday, March 27, 2011 - 8:30pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

On March 16th, HB 1948 (Amendment 1), the Surveillance Camera Data Collection Act unanimously passed the House Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee 11-0. The bill is now on second reading in the House.  HB 1948 (Amendment 1) would require agencies that own or have access to video surveillance cameras to disclose to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority the number of cameras they own or have access to, and the privacy regulations, if they have any. It would also require the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority to make this information accessible to the public by posting it on its website.

Representatives Voting In Support Of HB 1948:

Representative John Bradley (R-117th District)

Representative Michael Connelly (R-48th District)

Representative Dwight Kay (R-112th District)

Representative Lou Lang (R-16th District)

Representative Sidney Mathias (R-53rd District)

Representative Elaine Nekritz (D-57th District)

Representative Andre Thapedi (D-32nd District)

Representative Jil Tracy (D-93rd District)

Representative Arthur Turner (D - 9th District)

Representative Ann Williams (D-11th District)

Representative Michael Zalewski (D-21st District)

Want to Learn More About HB 1948?

Date

Sunday, March 27, 2011 - 7:28pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Police Practices and Racial Justice Government Accountability and Personal Privacy

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Illinois RSS