The Chicago Tribune has an editorial that builds on its investigative series "Harsh Treatment," which looks at the failure of the Illinois Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS) to care for children placed in treatment centers across the state. For the past 20 years, the ACLU of Illinois has been involved in litigation to improve care and services for children in DCFS custody. Although the number of children in DCFS custody has declined over the years, it is clear from the Tribune's reporting that the quality of care and services provided to them is on the decline.

The ACLU says it's pleased that more children are in safe, permanent homes, but the well-being of those in state custody has worsened in recent years. Associate Legal Director Ben Wolf says the ACLU is prepared to go back to court to enforce the consent decree.

Read the editorial.

Date

Thursday, December 11, 2014 - 5:30pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

Communications and Public Policy Director Ed Yohnka discussed the ACLU's concerns with the use of "stingray" technology by the Chicago Police Department (CPD) in a recent segment on WBEZ. Stingrays operate by mimicking a cellphone tower, and have the ability to access their owner's locations and other identifying information. Given the potential threat to privacy that the use of such technology by law enforcement has had in other states, the ACLU of Illinois will continue monitor the issue. Ed Yohnka stated:

“We know that this technology has been used in connection with protests in other places,” Yohnka said. “I don’t know whether or not that’s been used in Chicago. I would say that if this technology is being used to track people, if there are technologies that are being used to collect large swaths of communication, those are things that are very troubling and very wrong and I think people would rightly be concerned about them.”

Read the rest and listen to the segment.

Date

Wednesday, December 10, 2014 - 5:30pm

Featured image

Stingray

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

First Amendment Advocacy Government Accountability and Personal Privacy

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

Mark Wahlberg is already a famous movie star, but now he wants to expand that star power into the restaurant business.

The problem? He cant get the required licenses to open up shop.

Why? Because when he was a teenager, he was involved in more than a few instances of criminal behavior, including assault and battery in several racially-charged attacks.  He pleaded guilty and served time in prison.

Since then, Wahlberg says he has turned his life around.  He says he was a teenager when this happened and that hes grown up, and shouldnt be punished for something he wouldnt dream of doing today.  Hes outlined his charitable work and says hes no longer the kid who had dozens of run-ins with the Boston Police Department.

Wahlberg says hes a model citizen and hopes that Massachusetts sees it the same way.  Hes asked for a formal pardon for his crimes.

Wahlberg may be a household name, but his situation is far from one known by just the rich and famous.  Across the country, adults are being limited by crimes they committed as children. The difference is they dont have the high-powered attorneys or headline-grabbing names that can get their issues to the front of their governor.

Some may argue that people should pay for their crimes. Theres no disagreement there. But should adults who committed crimes as children really be blocked from getting a student loan, or some assistance with housing or a job -- simply because they did something stupid as a teen?  Especially with the racial disparity in the criminal justice system, people of color who have "paid" for their "youthful indiscretions" may pay for them repeatedly through lost opportunities.

There should be a punishment for a crime, but we should make sure that punishment fits the crime.  Too often, it does not.

People change.  Kids will do things they will regret as adults.  They should get the opportunity to live their lives once theyve paid for their crimes, and it shouldnt take star power to get this accomplished. This is why the ACLU of Illinois supports making it easier -- even automatic -- for some criminal records to be expunged, especially if the person does not get in any further trouble.

If it is good enough for Marky Mark, it should be good enough for all.

 

Date

Tuesday, December 9, 2014 - 5:30pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Justice Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Illinois RSS