In a news analysis piece for Truthout, journalist Victoria Law profiles a young man, DeAngelo Cortijo, who was detained in a California juvenile prison beginning at age 11. The article describes Cortijo's horrifying experience of being detained in solitary confinement for seven and a half months straight when he was 17 years old. As California and other states continue the fight to limit solitary confinement for youth like Cortijo, prison reform advocates across the nation are referencing the ACLU of Illinois lawsuit, RJ v. Jones, that brought about the end of solitary confinement for youth detained in Illinois Department of Juvenile Justice facilities. The new policies reached through a settlement agreement in the case prohibit the use of solitary confinement as a means of punishment, and require youth who are in solitary confinement for 24 hours or more to spend eight hours per day out of their cell. Law spoke with ACLU of Illinois senior staff counsel Adam Schwartz, who was the lead attorney in the case, about the conditions in Illinois' juvenile justice facilities at the time the case was filed:

Four years ago, Schwartz explained, youth confined by the Illinois Department of Juvenile Justice were placed in isolation for days - or in some cases, weeks - at a time. They had no contact with other people. They were deprived of education, mental health services and, often, even something to read. The isolation induces further anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. "It's fundamentally counter-therapeutic and destructive," he said. Moreover, solitary confinement was often used as a form of punishment.

Read the article.
 

Date

Monday, June 8, 2015 - 11:45am

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Justice Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

The Chicago Sun-Times published an editorial blasting the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) for the lack of a response to the report released in an ACLU of Illinois case challenging IDOC for failing to provide adequate medical care for its prisoners. The report was a result of a court-appointed panel of medical experts' evaluation of medical facilities within IDOC. The study cites sweeping problems throughout a broad range a medical services, including unqualified and incompetent physicians and nurses, inadequate medical leadership and unsanitary conditions within the facilities. Most notably, the report found that 60% of non-violent deaths show "significant lapses in care."

The study grew out a federal class-action lawsuit brought in 2010 by a diabetic inmate who said IDOC displays “deliberate indifference” toward inmates’ medical care. The suit now involves the American Civil Liberties Union and the state, which shared the costs of the report and agreed which prisons would be studied and which experts would be involved.

Read the entire editorial.

Date

Monday, June 8, 2015 - 9:45am

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Justice Reform

Show related content

Pinned related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Illinois RSS