ACLU of Illinois response to today’s Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. U.S. regarding the State of Arizona’s harsh anti-immigration law:

While striking down the vast majority of Arizona’s anti-immigration law, SB 1070, today's Supreme Court decision lifting a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the “show me your papers” provision in the harsh Arizona immigration law does real damage to citizens and non-citizens alike who will be targeted and detained by police based on nothing more than their physical appearance.  It will inevitably result in in race-based enforcement.

The American Civil Liberties Union continues to oppose these types of measures.  We note that Illinois rejects this approach to dealing with newcomers, exemplified by the fact that Cook County has declined to participate in the process of detaining arrestees while their immigration status is determined.  Illinois leaders recognize that such policies undermine police work and threaten our most basic American values.

Moving forward, the ACLU of Illinois will monitor any increased police activity -- by state or local law enforcement -- that targets immigrants.  If any such police activity results in racial profiling, we will take all necessary steps to challenge and stop biased policing.

Date

Monday, June 25, 2012 - 9:30am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Immigration

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

By Jessica Baum, Intern

“This is a human story,” said Ed Yohnka, Director of Communications and Public Policy for the ACLU of Illinois, at a luncheon held on June 20 to discuss the recently filed marriage suit. “This is about people who are seeking the freedom to marry. This is about couples who simply want nothing more than to have their love and commitment recognized by the affirmation of being married.”

The ACLU conference room was filled with as many as 40 people who came to have lunch and talk about Lazaro and Matos v. Orr, the ACLU of Illinois’ case seeking to lift the ban in Illinois law that denies same-sex couples the freedom to marry. A panel consisting attorneys of John Knight and Karen Sheley, and three of the 18 plaintiffs, Corynne Romine, Michelle Mascaro, and Liz Matos, discussed the case.

“I’ve been with my partner, Tanya, for about 15 years now,” said Matos. “Our bond between each other is unbreakable. And I just wish that I could call her my wife one day rather than have to explain myself to people about my relationship.”

The state of Illinois adopted Civil Unions for same-sex couples last year. Although that was an improvement, Sheley said it is not enough, and that civil unions deny Illinoisans basic benefits that married couples receive, as well as making them second class citizens. However, the ACLU believes progress has been made in the right direction.

“We’ve seen huge progress in the last few years, and certainly a great deal of progress in the last couple of years,” said Knight. “Our goal at the ACLU is to bring some level of relationship protection, and obviously the end result has got to marriage, throughout the country.”

Recently, both the Illinois Attorney General and the State Attorney said they agreed with the ACLU of Illinois’ suit that the ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Everyone on the panel was excited about this.

“I’m hopeful that we are on the right path,” said Romine. “We still have a lot of work to do.”

Knight does not expect this fight to end soon, and is prepared for the appeal process after the decision is issued from the circuit court. “We don’t really expect to have a final decision until the Illinois Supreme Court decides this issue,” he said.

And as members of the audience asked questions to the panel for clarification about the case and to share personal stories, the conversation kept coming back to the road ahead.
“This is a long term strategy to change hearts and minds,” said Colleen Connell, Executive Director of the ACLU of Illinois. “It’s a really, really important battle. I think this is one of the biggest battles of our lifetime.”

Date

Thursday, June 21, 2012 - 2:30pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

LGBTQ and HIV Advocacy

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

The Windy City Times posted an article about the ACLU of Illinois’ lawsuit against Bureau County for not giving Arick Buckles his HIV medication while he was in jail. Buckles said he asked for his medication at least 21 times, but the jail refused to provide it.

"Bureau County had an obligation under the Constitution to provide the medical care necessary to protect the health of Arick Buckles," said John Knight, LGBT project director at the ACLU of Illinois, in a statement. "They failed. They elevated concerns about costs and price of health care above the need for health care."

Read the whole thing.

Date

Thursday, June 21, 2012 - 2:22pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Illinois RSS