An article over at The Juvenile Justice Information Exchange discusses the recent expert reports released in the case R.J. v. Bishop, which seeks to improve conditions for juvenile offenders incarcerated in facilities operated by the Illinois Department of Juvenile Justice.  The reports, which look at the areas of education, mental health, and safety and welfare respectively, were a result of a consent decree which called for a remedial plan to help move forward with implementing improvements within the facilities. The Juvenile Justice Information Exchange spoke with the ACLU of Illinois attorney Adam Schwartz:

ACLU lead attorney Adam Schwartz says the plaintiff’s side of the case was saddened but not surprised by the conclusions of the reports. “We think it’s all on target,” he said. “Our complaint alleged systemic problems in mental health care and other areas, and the experts found systemic problems in those areas.”

Schwartz expressed confidence that the ACLU and IDJJ “are on the road to reform. These reports are the beginning of the process and not the end of the process. We are going to spend the next four months preparing the remedial plan to submit to Judge Kennelly, and after that we’re going to spend years implementing and monitoring. We are optimistic that this process is going to work, and we look forward to working with the department to create systemic solutions to the systemic problems.”

Read the entire article.

Date

Tuesday, October 8, 2013 - 2:21pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Justice Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

The Daily Herald covered Friday's hearing in the two marriage cases being managed by the ACLU of Illinois and Lambda Legal on behalf of a total of 25 couples seeking the freedom to marry in Illinois. Judge Sophia Hall threw out a motion to dismiss the case filed by same-sex marriage opponents. Friday's decision in the hearing allows the cases to move forward to hear the couple's arguments about how the denial of the freedom to marry harms them.

"Marriage is the standard in terms of how you define relationships in the U.S.," said 44-year-old Suzie Hutton, a plaintiff who now is in a civil union with her partner of 11 years, Danielle Cook. "It means something, and we want to be able to say we are married. It's about being with the one you love, the one who supports you and the one you go through the routine of life with."

Read the article.

 

Date

Tuesday, October 1, 2013 - 3:46pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

LGBTQ and HIV Advocacy

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

The Associated Press published an article on Friday's hearing on the motion to dismiss in the two marriage cases, Darby v. Orr and Lazaro v. Orr, which are being handled by Lambda Legal and the ACLU of Illinois respectively and represent a total of 25 couples seeking the freedom to marry in Illinois. The case will now move on to hear arguments from the couple's side about how the current law discriminates based on sexual orientation.

"Illinois is the only thing standing between these families and full federal respect for their relationships," said Camilla Taylor, marriage project director for Lambda Legal, which along with the American Civil Liberties Union is representing the plaintiffs.

Read the rest (via the Quad City Times).

Date

Tuesday, October 1, 2013 - 3:45pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

LGBTQ and HIV Advocacy

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Illinois RSS