According to columnist Michael Sneed, Cook County Clerk David Orr’s office predicts that it will soon issue the 1000th marriage license to same-sex couples. In February, Federal Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman ruled for immediate marriage equality in Lee v. Orr, a suit brought by the ACLU of Illinois and Lambda Legal, and ordered the Cook County Clerk’s office to promptly begin issuing marriage license to same sex applicants. Since then the office reports processing over 950 license applications and that a third of the applicant couples traveled from other Illinois counties to Orr’s office to obtain a marriage license. The Clerk’s office anticipates reaching the 1000 milestone as soon as Friday. Courtney Greve a spokeswoman for Orr’s office stated:

“We also expect the numbers to go up because of planned summer weddings and the 60-day period it takes to get a license.”

Read the whole thing.

Date

Wednesday, April 16, 2014 - 12:30pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

LGBTQ and HIV Advocacy

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

Illinois may follow the path of sixteen other states and revise its out-of-date, discriminatory laws against marijuana, Examiner.com writes. State Representative Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago) introduced legislation, now under consideration in the Illinois House, to address the incredibly high expenditures required to enforce current anti-marijuana laws in Illinois. These laws also are enforced disproportionately on people of color, especially young men of color. Though pot-use percentages are similar across all social and racial demographics, studies show that in Chicago, since August 2012 when the city lowered possession penalties, 78 percent of those arrested for possessing small amounts, were black. This cost the Chicago Police Department in 2013 over $23 million, and 46,000 police man-power hours. Cassidy’s bill, which is supported by the ACLU of Illinois, approaches the problem with a solid understanding of all sides of the drug-use issue, from law enforcement safety needs as well as the long term impact of possession records. The bill focuses on less criminality, not on decriminalization, and it would expunge possession records. Ed Yohnka, ACLU of Illinois Director of Communications and Public Policy, maintains that Cassidy’s bill would avoid the:

“collateral damage in housing, financial aid and public housing,” and that (afflict) people who are found to be in possession of such small amounts, (that) “we feel should not be criminalized.”


Read the whole article.

Date

Tuesday, April 15, 2014 - 3:00pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Justice Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar
Share Your StoryLearn More

Too often, a pregnant worker is forced to make an impossible decision: keep working and risk her health and pregnancy or lose her job and ability to support her family.

But thanks to legislation approved by the Illinois House of Representatives last Thursday, pregnant women will soon have a real choice. Sponsored by Rep. Mary Flowers, House Bill 8 allows pregnant workers to stay on the job and support their families by requiring employers to provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant workers.

Most Illinois women cannot afford to quit their jobs when they become pregnant since they are their families’ primary or co-breadwinner, although they might need a temporary job modification to allow them to work safely.

That was the case of Rosaura Villanueva, who worked for a shipping company unloading heavy packages from trucks. When she became pregnant, her supervisor refused to reasonably accommodate her and instead presented her with that impossible choice: “Quit or lose your baby.” She continued to work without an accommodation and miscarried.

Federal and Illinois law require employers to treat pregnant women the same as non-pregnant workers who are “similar in their ability or inability to work.” In other words, an employer that allows a worker with a temporary back injury to have a light duty assignment or offers assistance with heavy lifting should, under current law, also have to allow a pregnant worker the same reasonable accommodation.

However, courts have limited this important protection. For example, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which is based in Chicago, rejected the case of Victoria Serednyj whose employer refused to accommodate her pregnancy (and ultimately fired her), even though the employer admitted that it accommodated other, non-pregnant workers.

House Bill 8 makes clear that no woman should be forced to choose between her job and a healthy pregnancy. Modeled after the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), House Bill 8 only requires “reasonable accommodations,” and like the ADA, the bill does not require an employer to provide an accommodation that would impose an “undue hardship” on the employer. Decades of experience show that the costs of accommodations are typically very low. Indeed, common pregnancy-related accommodations include permission to carry a water bottle, breaks to use the restroom, and a stool to sit on.

The bill heads to the Illinois Senate for consideration, and Governor Quinn has announced his support, stating that House Bill 8 “will ensure healthier women and babies, and a stronger workforce across the state.” The ACLU of Illinois urges the Senate to quickly pass House Bill 8.

If you have experienced pregnancy discrimination at work, tell us your story.

Date

Tuesday, April 15, 2014 - 3:00pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Women's and Reproductive Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

28

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Illinois RSS