News & Commentary

Frid

In l

WILL-AM Radio 580 reports about Governor Pat Quinn's recent veto of a security bill that had passed unanimously in both houses. The bill (HB 1948), sponsored by State Rep.  Naomi Jakobsson, would require police agencies that utilize video surveillance to disclose information about the number of cameras used, as well as any privacy regulations, to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, and to post this information publicly online. The act of releasing this data would provide the public with critical information about video surveillance across Illinois. However, Gov. Quinn's decision to veto the bill was based on a concern over "security risks."Rep. Jakobsson says,

[D]rug testing invades privacy and bodily autonomy. Drug testing by means of urinalysis is humiliating for many people, and embarrassing or unpleasant for many others. Drug testing in the absence of individualized suspicion is stigmatizing: it creates a presumption of guilt that can only be rebutted by a negative test result. Just yesterday, in response to opposition, the CHA dropped the proposed drug testing from its revised tenants agreement (Read the ACLU response). Today, the Workforce, Development, and Audit Committee of the Chicago City Council followed suit, cancelling a meeting scheduled to consider a proposal to begin random drug testing of all city employees and elected officials. Mary Dixon, Legislative Director of the ACLU of Illinois, sent a letter to the committee outlining the problems with such a proposal:“The City of Chicago faces myriad challenges and few resources for addressing them,” added Dixon. “Suspicionless drug testing for 35,000 City employees does not a

In a letter dated June 3rd, ACLU Legal Director Harvey Grossman asked the Chicago Housing Authority not to implement new provisions mandating suspicionless drug testing of applicants and residents of public housing. Grossman writes:

Our

P

Late