All Cases

17 Court Cases
Court Case
Jan 10, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Institutionalized Persons|
  • +1 Issue

Hicks v. Illinois Department of Corrections

We represent Amy Hicks, a woman from downstate Illinois who was forced to undergo the non-consensual induction of her labor during the birth of her third child while she was in the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections at the Logan Correctional Center in Lincoln, Illinois. This experience violated Ms. Hicks’ rights under the Illinois Reproductive Health Act, a law that explicitly allows every person in our state to make their own autonomous decisions about their reproductive health care, and the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right of individuals to refuse unwanted medical care. Ms. Hicks was well along in her third trimester of pregnancy when she entered Logan Correctional Center in January of 2024. Almost from the moment she got to Logan, Ms. Hicks was told by one prison staffer and medical provider after another that she would be scheduled for an induction of her labor prior to her due date. Ms. Hicks repeatedly made clear to medical professionals and IDOC staff that she did not want to be induced and wished to go into labor naturally, just as she had done with her first two children. All of these people ignored her wishes and told her that she would be scheduled for an induction because this was the protocol for all pregnant inmates, regardless of what she wanted. In early February, two full weeks ahead of her due date, Ms. Hicks was taken (in shackles) to a hospital where the induction was performed. This experience of having her express wishes regarding her medical care disregarded was extremely upsetting and traumatizing for Ms. Hicks. We are asking a federal court to recognize that Ms. Hicks’ treatment while in custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections violated her rights under federal and state law and ensure that she is compensated for her suffering. We hope this case prompts changes so that the right of all incarcerated individuals to make their own decisions about how they will give birth will be respected going forward.
Court Case
Jan 31, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Women's and Reproductive Rights

Jane Doe v. Margaret Burke et al.

Court Case
Jan 22, 2024
Placeholder image
  • Women's and Reproductive Rights

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, et al. v. Mario Treto Jr. and Ronald Schroeder, et al. v. Mario Treto Jr.

Court Case
Jan 26, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Women's and Reproductive Rights

Stachler v. BOE

Court Case
Nov 22, 2022
Placeholder image
  • Women's and Reproductive Rights

Luster-Hoskins v. Hall

Court Case
Jul 12, 2022
Placeholder image
  • Women's and Reproductive Rights

People v. Bowers and People v. Wells

Court Case
Feb 03, 2022
Placeholder image
  • Women's and Reproductive Rights

Ms. F. v. St. Alexius Medical Center

Court Case
Jul 11, 2018
Placeholder image
  • Women's and Reproductive Rights

Darolyn Lee v. Mercy Hospital and Medical Center

Court Case
Apr 27, 2018
Judith Miller
  • Women's and Reproductive Rights

Judith Miller v. Circuit Court of Cook County, Cook County Board of Commissioners, and Public Building Commission of Chicago