ACLU v. Alvarez

  • Filed: August 19, 2010
  • Status: Won appeal
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
  • Latest Update: Jan 05, 2011
Placeholder image

In August 2010, we sued the Cook County State’s Attorney, Anita Alvarez, seeking to enjoin prosecution of the ACLU under the Illinois Eavesdropping Act for expanding our police monitoring program to include audio recording of on-duty police in public places. The case arose from a number of instances in which individuals or organizations that wanted to monitor police activity in order to detect any misconduct were prosecuted under the law. The ACLU itself was the plaintiff in this case because we frequently monitor police behavior and wanted to make audio recordings of police performing their public duties. We asserted that the ACLU has a First Amendment right to gather this information, disseminate it to the public, and present it to courts and government agencies in petitioning for redress of grievances.

In January 2011, U.S. District Court Judge Susan Conlon denied our motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that there was no First Amendment right to record an on-duty police officer operating in public. We appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and six other media organizations joined as amicus on our behalf.

In May 2012, the appellate court ruled in our favor, finding that the First Amendment protects the ACLU program. The court ordered the trial court to enter a preliminary injunction in our favor. In July 2012, the federal district court issued the preliminary injunction, but also granted the State’s Attorney’s request to stay proceedings while they sought review of the Appeals Court’s decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. In November 2012, the Supreme Court denied the defendant’s request for review. In December 2012, the federal district court granted our unopposed motion for summary judgment, and in January 2013 issued the permanent injunction that we sought.

In a later case, the Illinois Eavesdropping Act was also struck down by the Illinois Supreme Court. (People v. Melongo, 2014 IL 114852.) The current version of the statute, enacted in 014, only prohibits recording of private conversations. There is currently no prohibition of recording police officers in public in Illinois.

Case Number:
10-CV-05235
Judge:
Judge Susan Conlon; Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman; Judge Richard Posner; Judge Diane Sykes; Judge David Hamilton
Attorney(s):
Harvey Grossman, Adam Schwartz, Karen Sheley

New brief filed in ACLU v. Alvarez

Yesterday, the ACLU of Illinois filed a new brief in our case, ACLU v. Alvarez, seeking to end prosecutions for recording public conversations with police. The brief, simultaneously arguing for a preliminary injunction and opposing the defendant's motion to dismiss the case, states:

Placeholder image

ACLU amends challenge to eavesdropping law

In August 2010, the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois filed a lawsuit arguing that civilians have a right protected by the First Amendment to make audio recordings of on-duty police officers. The plaintiff in the lawsuit is the ACLU of Illinois as an organization, because we want to audio record police as part of our on-going police monitoring and advocacy. Specifically, the ACLU of Illinois challenged the use of Illinois Eavesdropping Act to prosecute individuals who record police conversations with civilians that take place in public, while police are performing their duties, and when those conversations are audible to the human ear. The ACLU contends that such prosecutions unlawfully preclude individuals - and organizations such as the ACLU of Illinois - from being able to record police interactions on public streets and thoroughfares and disseminate that information to policy makers in order to address specific policy concerns.

Placeholder image

Appeal Filed in ACLU v. Alvarez

Updated May 4, 2011: A handful of national journalism organizations have filed an amici curiae brief in support of the ACLU’s appeal. They are the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of News Editors, Association of Capitol Reporters and Editors, Citizen Media Law Project, National Press Photographers Association, Radio Television Digital News Association and the Society of Professional Journalists.  Download Amicus Brief

Placeholder image

Chicago Tribune: Woman who recorded cops acquitted of felony eavesdropping charges

In c

Placeholder image

Chicago Sun-Times Editorial: Protect the public’s right to eavesdrop

Frid

Placeholder image

Audio from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Hearing

The

Placeholder image

Huffington Post: Illinois Eavesdropping Law Supported By Influential Circuit Judge

The

Placeholder image

Thanks to citizens with cameras

Leonard Pitts' syndicated column appeared in The Chicago Tribune about the use of cameras to record police activity in light of the November 18 UC Davis incident, where a police officer doused seated occupy protesters with liberal amounts of pepper spray. He poses the question: what if there had been no cameras to record the incident?

Placeholder image

Chicago Tribune: State's eavesdropping law faces growing challenges

The

Placeholder image

The Courthouse News Service: Illinois Eavesdropping Law Assailed on Appeal

The Illinois Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday on the constitutionality of the Illinois Eavesdropping Act which requires consent from all parties if a conversation is recorded, whether or not the conversation is private. The ACLU of Illinois filed amicus briefs on behalf of both of the criminal defendants whose cases were heard. In People v. Clark, the accused was representing himself in a civil proceeding, and recorded a court hearing and a brief conversation with the opposing lawyer, in order to advance his access to the courts. In People v. Melongo, the defendant recorded her phone conversations with a county court reporter and then posted the recordings online, in order to advance her claim of ineffective government services. Ms. Melongo was arrested and imprisoned for 18 months while awaiting the conclusion of her trial. In both of these cases, a trial judge held that people have the right to record these kinds of conversations. The prosecutors appealed these decisions to the state’s Supreme Court. The Courthouse News highlighted portions of the ACLU of Illinois’ brief in support of Ms. Melongo’s claim.

Placeholder image

The Columbia Chronicle: Controversial eavesdropping law struck down

The Illinois State Supreme Court recently struck down the state's eavesdropping law. The ruling came in two cases where the law's requirement of consent of all parties before a conversation could be recorded had been used in some places to prosecute individuals who recorded conversations that were really not private, or involved recording public officials doing their public duties. The Court found the language of the law was too vague and too broad in permitting these prosecutions. Now, members of Illinois General Assembly must pass legislation in order to put an eavesdropping law in place. The ACLU of Illinois has urged the General Assembly to maintain the important privacy protections in the previous law, protections that protect residents of Illinois against broad government intrusion. Ed Yohnka, ACLU of Illinois Communications Director noted the challenge here:

judge_gavel_by_salfalco_filtered_500x280-300x199_0.jpg

WUIS: Lawmakers Work To Replace Illinois’ Eavesdropping Law

Since the Illinois State Supreme Court struck down the state’s anti-eavesdropping law for being too broadly written it has been legal in Illinois to secretly record conversations without permission from either party. The Illinois Senate passed legislation, sponsored by Senator Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago), which would establish new guidelines tailored to today’s cell phone technology and supporters believe the State House could take up the issue during the veto session. Ed Yohnka, ACLU of Illinois Director of Communications and Public Policy, wishes the old law had not been struck down but pointed out legislators should craft a bill that includes:

Placeholder image

Related News & Podcasts

News & Commentary
Oct 07, 2010
Placeholder image
  • First Amendment Advocacy|
  • +1 Issue

New brief filed in ACLU v. Alvarez

Yesterday, the ACLU of Illinois filed a new brief in our case, ACLU v. Alvarez, seeking to end prosecutions for recording public conversations with police. The brief, simultaneously arguing for a preliminary injunction and opposing the defendant's motion to dismiss the case, states:
News & Commentary
Nov 19, 2010
Placeholder image
  • Government Surveillance|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU amends challenge to eavesdropping law

In August 2010, the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois filed a lawsuit arguing that civilians have a right protected by the First Amendment to make audio recordings of on-duty police officers. The plaintiff in the lawsuit is the ACLU of Illinois as an organization, because we want to audio record police as part of our on-going police monitoring and advocacy. Specifically, the ACLU of Illinois challenged the use of Illinois Eavesdropping Act to prosecute individuals who record police conversations with civilians that take place in public, while police are performing their duties, and when those conversations are audible to the human ear. The ACLU contends that such prosecutions unlawfully preclude individuals - and organizations such as the ACLU of Illinois - from being able to record police interactions on public streets and thoroughfares and disseminate that information to policy makers in order to address specific policy concerns.
News & Commentary
Apr 20, 2011
Placeholder image
  • First Amendment Advocacy|
  • +1 Issue

Appeal Filed in ACLU v. Alvarez

Updated May 4, 2011: A handful of national journalism organizations have filed an amici curiae brief in support of the ACLU’s appeal. They are the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of News Editors, Association of Capitol Reporters and Editors, Citizen Media Law Project, National Press Photographers Association, Radio Television Digital News Association and the Society of Professional Journalists.  Download Amicus Brief
News & Commentary
Aug 26, 2011
Placeholder image
  • First Amendment Advocacy|
  • +1 Issue

Chicago Tribune: Woman who recorded cops acquitted of felony eavesdropping charges

In c