site map || search || contact us || home
Home » News » Archives » Studs Terkel, Other Prominent Chicagoans Join Together to Challenge AT&T Sharing of Telephone Records with the National Security Agency

Studs Terkel, Other Prominent Chicagoans Join Together to Challenge AT&T Sharing of Telephone Records with the National Security Agency

Plaintiffs Young, Montgomery and CurrieCelebrated Chicago author Studs Terkel and prominent leaders in the medical, legal, political and faith communities today filed a federal lawsuit charging that telephone giant AT&T violated their privacy by secretly sharing the telephone records of millions of Americans with the National Security Agency. The secret program was revealed in a May 11, 2006 article in USA Today.

The prominent Chicago area professionals who filed the lawsuit today note their special concerns with the government's gathering of the phone records of innocent Americans. As a journalist, for example, Mr. Terkel wants the capacity to keep sources secret from government scrutiny. Lawyers, doctors and clergy members rely upon confidentiality in order to best serve their clients, patients and congregants. Elected officials rely on the ability to strategize and communicate with allies and others without the federal executive branch monitoring their activities.

In addition to Mr. Terkel, the other plaintiffs in the case filed in federal district court in Chicago today include: Barbara Flynn Currie, Majority Leader of the Illinois House of Representatives; Rabbi Gary Gerson of Oak Park Temple; Professor Diane Geraghty, Director of the Civitas ChildLaw Center at Loyola University School of Law, Chicago; James Montgomery, former Corporation Counsel for the City of Chicago; and, Dr. Quinten Young, a physician and advocate for health care reform.

ACLU Lawyer Harvey Grossman"Having been blacklisted from working in television during the McCarthy era, I know the harm of government using private corporations to intrude into the lives of innocent Americans," said Terkel. "When government uses the telephone companies to create massive databases of all our phone calls it has gone too far. "

The group of renowned plaintiffs contends that AT&T violated their individual right to engage in telephone conversations without government monitoring under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. That law, according to the complaint, prohibits any entity providing "an electronic communication service" from divulging the records of customers to governmental agencies.

Without consent of customers or other lawful certification authorized by a court order, according to published reports, the National Security Agency sought the records of tens of millions of telephone customers in the United States. Indeed, when Denver-based Qwest Communications asked the NSA for the legal authority behind their request to that company for telephone records, the NSA discontinued the request.

"For the individuals we represent today, the ability to act without government oversight and intrusion is critical to the function of their profession," said Harvey Grossman, Legal Director for the ACLU of Illinois representing the five plaintiffs. "The NSA program, if unchecked, interferes with the ability of lawyers to deal with clients, doctors to treat their patients and clergy to counsel members of their congregation."

The plaintiffs have asked the federal court to certify a class of Illinois residents who use AT&T for telephone service and to enjoin AT&T from divulging any further information to the NSA. The plaintiffs will seek a prompt hearing on their request for a preliminary injunction.

Plaintiff Montgomery"The disclosure of the NSA program was of grave concern to me," added James Montgomery. "If people seeking legal advice or representation know the government is monitoring who I am calling or who is calling me, they may be less inclined to seek that advice." The NSA program, then, limits a lawyer's ability to help those in need."

The national ACLU, which filed a legal challenge in January to the NSA's warrantless wiretapping, also is of counsel in today's lawsuit.

"Our corporate and political leaders should talk straight with the American people about these secret demands for customer phone records," said ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero. "Whether the government is monitoring or intercepting the domestic and international calls of millions of Americans without warrants goes to the heart of our system of checks and balances."

Chicago attorneys William Hooks of the Hooks Law Offices and Marc Beem and Zachary Freeman of the law firm Miller, Shakman & Beem, are assisting the ACLU of Illinois in the case.








Comments

Dear Sirs,
In the mean time do you recommend that we find another telecommunication provider, beside AT&T?
D.Clayton


I'm so relieved that you're doing this.

This is why an organization like the ACLU is so essential to the life of our democratic society.

Good luck and thanks!


Thank you.
I think commenting with our pocketbooks is probably the best method.
I would like to know a viable alternative to these complicitly political phone companies.


Bravo!


We need to stop them and all corporations who are recording our conversations.
We have the right to privacy and it is being stolen from us.
No one should be recording our phone calls without a warrant.


A wretched invasion of privacy. Next thing you know, they will be making warrantless arrests -- wait, they did that already!

Thanks. This has to stop.


this is great. glad and proud of what you are doing on our behalf. I am reminded of childhood experiences in Germany in the 30s, afraid of knocks on the door.
Harvey, Colleen: congratulations on this and the discussion last night.


I joined the ACLU many years ago, at the time of the House Unamerican Activities Committee, because I felt that the ACLU would serve as a counterforce to HUAC. I've remained a member because the ACLU continues to work to eradicate that "HUAC" virus, even as the virus continually mutates itself to evade the constitutional prohibitions against it.


How can an individual join the suit?


Go Studs!!!


I switched my phone company the day I heard about our phone records being turned over to the NSA. I now have comcast phone service. Comcast ensured me they do not give records to the government without a warrent. Thank you ACLU for doing this!


Great move, Colleen and Harvey! Do you suppose the President will respond by sharing his collection of all of our connections with all of us incrementally?


Can I join this lawsuit?


When given the chance to justify its vast and unprecedented intrusions into some of the innermost spheres of our private and interpersonal lives, the Washington regime has resorted to the arguments that, well, (a) this is a new world in which we are living, and (b) besides, the President decreed that it is okay, so it must be okay.

That is to say, not only that the President is above the U.S. Constitution and the statutory laws of the land. But also that the President is The Law. Plain and simple.

For AT&T, my own local and long-distance telephony provider, to acquiesce to an executive decree such as this, rather than to resist it, and to warn me about it, is an outrage.

Is every last one of us to be treated as presumptive members of the September 11 hijackers now?

I hereby join the ACLU – Illinois lawsuit against AT&T. (http://www.aclu-il.org/news/archives/terkelvatt.pdf )


Post a comment


   © 2008. This is the website of the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois and the Roger Baldwin Foundation of ACLU, Inc. (Privacy Policy)(Site User Agreement)

ACLU of Illinois » 180 N. Michigan, Ste 2300 » Chicago, IL 60601 » Phone: 312-201-9740   Fax: 312-201-9760 » Email: acluofillinois@aclu-il.org   Website: http://www.aclu-il.org